Introduction

The modding scene for Grand Theft Auto V (GTA V) has been buzzing lately, all thanks to FiveM, a cool multiplayer modding framework that’s opened up a whole new world of possibilities in the game. With FiveM, server owners can create their own awesome RP experiences. And when it comes to frameworks, there are four big players in the game: ESX vs qbcore vs vRP!

So let’s take a deep dive into these frameworks, comparing them and giving you all the deets, so you can make the best choice for your server.

Comparison Table – All Frameworks

ESX Framework

ESX, also known as EssentialMode Extended, is an enduring and prominent framework in the FiveM community. Its extensive feature set and well-established community support have made it a go-to choice for many server owners.

Strengths:

• Robust Documentation and Support: ESX boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, ensuring server owners and developers have access to ample resources and support.
• Rich Ecosystem: A multitude of ESX resources and scripts, both official and community-created, cater to various needs, from inventory systems to job frameworks and economy management.
• Customization Options: ESX’s flexibility allows server owners to tailor the framework to suit their specific RP concept.
• Built-in Features: ESX ships with a plethora of built-in features, providing a solid foundation for server development.
• Regular Updates: The community-driven development ensures regular updates and maintenance.

Weaknesses:

• Complexity: ESX’s comprehensive feature set can overwhelm newcomers, necessitating a steeper learning curve.
• Resource Intensive: The framework’s richness can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting server performance.
• Homogeneity: Some argue that ESX servers tend to offer similar gameplay experiences unless extensively customized.

qbCore Framework

qbcore has been making substantial waves in the FiveM community for its simplicity and adaptability. It presents server owners with a clean slate upon which to build unique RP experiences.

Strengths:

• User-Friendly: qbcore’s user-friendly nature appeals to both server owners and developers, particularly those new to FiveM.
• Resource Efficiency: As a lightweight framework, qbcore places fewer demands on server resources, enhancing performance.
• Modularity: Its modular structure permits easy customization and integration of additional features.
• Active Development: qbcore continues to evolve with ongoing development efforts.
• Community Compatibility: It is compatible with a wide array of community-created resources.

Weaknesses:

• Feature Set: qbcore may lack some advanced features found in more established frameworks like ESX.
• Smaller Community: As a newer framework, qbcore’s community is smaller, which may result in fewer available resources and scripts.
• Simplicity: The simplicity of qbcore may not suit server owners seeking complex and diverse gameplay experiences.

Find out more about qbCore here

vRP Framework (deprecated)

vRP, also known as vRoleplay, was once a trailblazing framework in the FiveM RP scene, offering a distinct approach to roleplaying with a dedicated following.

Strengths:

• Unique Experience: vRP is celebrated for providing a unique and immersive RP experience, focusing on storytelling and player immersion.
• Customization: It offers high levels of customization with a focus on dynamic character creation and realistic economics.
• Innovation: vRP introduces innovative features that diverge from the traditional RP framework.
• Loyal Userbase: Despite occasional inactivity in development, vRP maintains a dedicated and loyal userbase, resulting in a variety of resources.
• Active Development (Community): The community has taken up the mantle, ensuring active development and updates.

Weaknesses:

• Development Uncertainty: vRP has experienced periods of inactivity in official development, causing concerns about its long-term support.
• Distinctiveness: The distinct gameplay style may not appeal to all players, potentially limiting a server’s audience.
• Learning Curve: New server owners may face a steep learning curve due to vRP’s unique features and mechanics.

vrpex (deprecated)

vrpex is an extension of vRP aimed at modernizing and addressing some of the original framework’s limitations, with the goal of revitalizing vRP’s appeal.

Strengths:

• Modernization: vrpex represents a more contemporary and updated version of vRP, bringing improvements and enhancements.
• Performance Boost: The framework offers improved performance and optimization compared to the original vRP.
• Compatibility: vrpex is designed with enhanced compatibility with other FiveM resources in mind.
• Ongoing Development: Developers continue to work on vrpex, introducing new features and addressing issues.

Weaknesses:

• Newness: Being a relatively new framework, vrpex may have fewer resources and scripts compared to older, more established frameworks.
• Transition Hurdles: Migrating from vRP to vrpex may require additional work for server owners already using the original vRP framework.

Conclusion

• Stability: Choose ESX for stability, robust documentation, and a large community.
• Documentation: ESX excels in documentation and support.
• User-Friendliness: qbcore is simple and ideal for newcomers.
• Resource Efficiency: qbcore is lightweight and enhances performance.
• Large Community: ESX and qbcore provide more resources and support.

Choosing the most suitable FiveM framework is a pivotal decision that greatly impacts the overall gameplay experience on your server. Each framework, namely ESX, qbcore, vRP, and vrpex, possesses unique strengths and weaknesses, catering to varying preferences and objectives of server owners. ESX, for instance, stands out as a feature-rich and robust choice, while qbcore prioritizes simplicity and flexibility. On the other hand, vRP and vrpex offer distinctive and immersive role-playing experiences.

When making a decision, it is essential to align your framework choice with your server’s vision, your level of familiarity with the FiveM platform, and the preferences of your player community.

Conclusion: Which framework is the best?

The choice between ESX and qbCore depends on your needs:

ESX is feature-rich, widely used, and has extensive community support, making it ideal for those seeking a robust, well-documented framework. However, it can be more complex and demanding on server resources.

qbCore is simpler, modular, and resource-efficient, making it user-friendly and great for newcomers or those looking for better performance with less complexity.